To go back a bit to Mr. Carr's comments, the challenge in this bill that I'm trying to get at with my amendment—and we may need to amend it—is around competing Métis identification, the point being whether a Métis person can be a member of both the MNA and Peavine Métis Settlement or of both the MNA and the Métis of Cadotte. That was their concern: Were there going to be competing Métis memberships? Will the MNA be competing for their members?
I'm not even necessarily certain that my.... When I quoted and I sent that in, I was saying that we want to make sure we're not setting up competing memberships. What would happen if somebody were a member of both? What does that look like? Maybe we can ask our officials about that as well. If a Métis person were a member of the Peavine Métis Settlement and a member of the Métis Nation of Alberta, there were some concerns around these competitions. I imagine that there wouldn't necessarily be a challenge for that, but there's nothing in this bill that prevents that from being a thing.