Let's think about it this way: Bill C-10 was co-drafted. Because we co-drafted it, we commit to being partners with Canada.
Our agreements require us to review our agreements every five years around efficiencies. In reviewing those agreements, we also identify the flaws. With regard to implementation, efficiencies and clarification, as you highlighted, those need to come from our partnership arrangement. We don't ever want to get caught in litigation. The most effective way to resolve disputes is by having partner-to-partner conversations. Modern treaty implementation allows for that to happen.
I'll turn to Brianna. Maybe she has a direct answer to that question with respect to litigation.
As self-governing modern treaties in the Yukon, we have 11 of the 26, so we have 30 years of experience. We've had many opportunities to resolve disputes, and we try to do it in a Crown-indigenous relationship conversation without going to the courts to find dispute, because that's costly. It takes years. It takes time and resources, and it takes away resources from our own people in implementing program services. We don't want to do that. We want to look at a process that works effectively.