Okay. I think we're part of the conversation with the Auditor General. It's whether or not the government wants to act or do anything about it. I guess reports are okay, but they often get shelved. I was just on the Auditor General's website, and there are tons of reports that everyone's probably forgotten about, which is unfortunate.
We talk about a whole-of-government approach; this commissioner would get to look at that approach. Wouldn't it be fair to say that when the government signs on the dotted line, it would be a whole-of-government approach to implement and stand true to the word of the treaty?
