Okay. Thank you so much.
I want to use the same analogy Jamie shared about what the problems are in our current system and ask Justine whether this is the analogy we need to help show why the commissioner's role is so important.
Jamie is saying, for example, that the prescription is wrong for trying to make sure reconciliation is being honoured. I wonder if, based on his analysis of decades and decades of things not being corrected, this was because the prescriptions used have been alternative methods and not the correct one. I wonder if, using that analogy, we are moving in a direction in which the commissioner is the more accurate prescription—one who can make sure the modern treaties are being upheld, as an independent commissioner does not have affiliations to parties and doesn't have affiliations, necessarily, that are not only public in nature but....
I appreciate the Attorney General. I have absolutely nothing against the Attorney General, but they have a much broader role in monitoring. Given that this commissioner will have to be a specialist, maybe this is indeed the more correct prescription to help make sure reconciliation is being monitored, given the independence and the objectives of the commissioner's role.