For one interesting positive outcome, we could look at the lead from the Supreme Court of Canada, if I may use that example. In their decision on the Bill C-92 case from Quebec, they looked at the approach that I was advocating, in which you have the three elements—the UN declaration, treaty and the TRC calls to action—as a cluster. Maybe we can take that cluster and create a new legal space for a path forward. We could have the example I gave you of a treaty-based government as a solution to the challenge we have collectively on discrimination, racism and so on, relying on traditional laws, incorporating this into their own constitution and merging it with Canadian law.
I think we need to recognize there are possible ways forward. Sometimes we have to create a new legal space of recognition. The example I'm using works. It's working for that nation through their constitution, through their own law, and incorporating traditional practices to create a way forward for their own nation that deals with the discriminatory challenges we're talking about through Bill S-2.