That's a pretty simple question. Thank you for that. I would say yes.
There are obviously some areas that are so archaeologically significant to the communities that they want them to be no-go areas. Industry certainly understands that, but there are way too many opportunities where significant pieces of land are removed without a proper assessment being done before that land is removed in perpetuity. Removing that land in perpetuity removes benefits to the community.
There should be a better assessment for putting that land, in perpetuity, out of touch to industry. In a lot of cases, it's not being done.