[Witness spoke in Tsuut'ina and provided the following text:]
Datanastada Sizi Keith Blake at’a, Guyamoha Tosguna.
[Witness provided the following translation:]
Greetings, my name is Keith Blake, Chief of Police of the Tsuut’ina Nation Police.
[English]
Good afternoon, everyone. I am Keith Blake, Chief of Police of the Tsuut’ina Nation Police Service. I have been so for almost 13 years. I am also vice-president of the First Nations Chiefs of Police Association. We represent the independent 36 indigenous police services across this country.
I first of all want to thank the committee for this opportunity to provide critical testimony on first nation policing and to discuss the vital need for program change and government support in the transformation of the first nations and Inuit policing program. This is the second time I've appeared before this committee. I must express disappointment that since my original testimony of over four years ago, we've seen very little of the change that was required and that everyone agreed was needed.
Before I speak to some of the inequities, I just want to give you a sense of our community and our service. Our community has about 2,500 band members. We have a land mass of over 300 square kilometres. We have 36 police officers. We are funded from both the tripartite provincial and federal funding partners, but we have a substantial commitment from our nation that pays for well over 16 officers within our complement.
I really want to speak to the fact that our service, like the other 35, is a community-centred and culturally aligned service that's fully accountable to our community. Our service and the other 35 independent indigenous police services are doing an incredible job of community safety, culturally appropriate service delivery and outreach within our communities. This is despite being chronically underfunded and having year-to-year funding envelopes that do not allow us to look at strategizing on how we need to provide that community safety.
It doesn't mean that we don't have a staggering amount of attrition. In our service alone, two years ago we had one-third of our frontline operations leave to join the Calgary Police Service. During their exit interviews, each of the officers wanted to stay in first nations policing, but because of the inequities in pay, benefits and pension, they felt it was an unstable funding model. They needed to provide security for their families.
We have to thank those first nations police officers who continue to perform with outstanding results despite having lower salaries, pensions and wages than their colleagues in mainstream policing. They are to be commended and sincerely thanked for their sacrifices.
I want to speak to a couple of really important examples of where first nations policing does provide a superior service. Despite all of our indigenous communities having the highest crime severity index in the country, we see far fewer use of force incidents and far fewer, if any, lethal force. I'm not suggesting that when you're looking at those situations that occur they're not justified, but that is a disproportionate number of deaths. We can all recall that, tragically, in 2024, within 15 days, six indigenous people died when coming in contact with mainstream policing across Canada. A total of 15 that year died in police interactions or while in custody.
When we're looking at that, it's highlighting a stark overrepresentation of indigenous peoples in fatal law enforcement encounters. It underscores systemic failures. Again, I'm not contending that those lethal force encounters weren't justified, but it is an alarmingly disproportionate statistic that demands further review and understanding.
I know that government is data-driven. I believe one of the more significant data drawn from Public Safety Canada recently was the evaluation of the FNIPP. It was reported through Public Safety Canada that communities that are policed by independent first nations police services were substantially more likely, almost four times more likely, to say that policing is a strength in their community compared with those communities that are policed by mainstream policing.
Now, we also say that not moving forward with the promised essential service legislation and reform has created increased instability within our services. This is compounded by the multiple messaging coming from political leaders, agencies and officials all speaking about how the program and system are broken and need immediate attention. Without attention, it implies that the government is neglectful, apathetic or indifferent to the officers and the communities we serve.
Getting back to the use of force, I truly believe it's as a result of the relationship our officers have with our community. It's not merely a police officer and offender relationship. It's the de-escalation ability of our officers who have a relationship with our community members.
I had a number of quotes that I wanted to provide, from prime ministers to public safety ministers to auditors general to the CACP to the Quebec court of appeal, all saying that this system, this method of funding and supporting our services, needs to change. We—