She's bringing down the hammer, so to speak—or she's saying she is—to enforce a resolution mechanism that they follow through on their commitment for the Brampton retooling SIF agreement, but in other testimony today, she linked all of the agreements, sort of alluding to that, and in her letter publicly she mentioned it as well. She said, “In particular, the legally binding commitments that Stellantis made by accepting support through both the Strategic Innovation Fund and...the Special Contribution Agreement with NextStar Energy”.
What I'm trying to really get at is that she's saying that we're looking at all of the money we're giving you with all of these three commitments and it's all on the line if you don't follow through and get these 3,000 jobs. That's what she's telling the public, but then what I'm putting together here is that this is not really the case. This is what I'm asking you to correct for me.
These Brampton SIF agreements, that's really the only funding she's looking at. Is that what I'm understanding?