Again, because they're payload-agnostic, the idea is that these could serve anything from ISR—intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance—which is what Canada has typically used drones for in the past, to carrying a strike package, which the Ukrainian military is most focused on in terms of use of our system, to carrying electronic warfare jamming capabilities to serving as a decoy. There are 20 different mission sets that our systems are designed for. It really depends on who you're talking to.
Within any of the Canadian Armed Forces' perspectives, we're just having those conversations very early as we've mostly focused our attention on Ukraine, where there's the greatest and most urgent need. Our conversations with the CAF have been very illuminating in terms of how they're thinking about something that bridges the gap between a one-way drone and a drone that comes back many times.
We have started to think about one-way attack drones, but we also have deployed the vast majority of our capital on drones that fly for hundreds of thousands of hours. It's really within that gap. For Canada, our drones will serve as the intersection between ISR and strike. Which way they will be weighted will depend on the mission set.