Well, I won't say too much on X, because I launched my investigation last week. We're going to proceed swiftly on it, we're going to use the tools and we're going to draw our conclusions on it.
I think there's a challenge, if I look to our concluded investigation of Pornhub on the similar and related issue of online-based abuse and the sharing of intimate videos without the consent of individuals in the context of revenge porn and other types of situations. We investigated. We made a finding that this breached privacy law. We made strong recommendations that there needed to be a solution from now on, forward looking, but what do you do with what has already been posted? We also wanted that to be taken down. We wanted the takedown mechanisms to be faster and to be user-friendly. The company refused to do that.
Now we are in Federal Court trying to enforce this, but it is slow and expensive, and in the meantime those images continue to be available. That's where amending PIPEDA and giving my office order-making powers and the ability to issue or recommend fines would allow a much more immediate remedy, which could then be challenged in front of the court. That's the challenge.
You're often going to have responsive complaints or proactive complaints. In the context of Grok, I initiated it myself, but what's important is that once those are concluded, you get a real and meaningful remedy if there has been a violation.