Okay. We have a challenge of the chair.
Colleagues, we've been through this before. Mr. Guglielmin is challenging the chair's ruling in terms of the relevancy vis-à-vis the scope of the amendment proposed by Mr. Bardeesy to the main motion, which struck the word “China” and replaced it with “globally”, in essence.
Are there any questions, or can I go to the clerk to call the vote?
Madam Clerk, I will ask you, because I know the terminology for this one can sometimes be confusing, to clarify for members what word they need to use in order to properly express their perspective.
Thank you.