Some of my colleagues have mentioned this. There are many things to be done. I would say there are three things we would benefit from. The first is defining sovereignty. Sovereignty is more than data residency. I think that's an important nuance because, in a lot of cases, data residency has been the de facto standard, and that is not, by definition, what we're talking about. Data sovereignty and AI sovereignty are really important factors. A number of reports are coming out, but I'd say that's number one. We would look at that.
The second one would be the certainty around certain aspects of data or certain data types that are critical for us. We can look at citizen service delivery, health care data or places where we want to truly improve productivity. Picking those sectors and putting them right at the top would be a really important aspect, where you could give more policy certainty.
The third one is the pieces of legislation that are still pending. We haven't updated PIPEDA in a long time, and our privacy laws, etc., need to be strengthened. Having policy certainty around those critical layers outside the data layer are important elements that will give businesses a lot of certainty and will give industry a lot of certainty. I think that will allow us to operate and innovate in those places.