Thank you, Mr. Chair.
My understanding from when we last spoke about the potential of this study or this meeting is that there was nothing scheduled for next Thursday, which was conveniently done to allow the people who are already scheduled for Monday's study, for example, to come rather than cancel. We thought we could start this study on a day when there was nothing scheduled at the time. That was a bit of the rationale there, as you may recall, in our discussion on Monday.
From my calculation, if we started on Monday and the amendment passes to have three meetings, that would be the 23rd, the 27th and the 30th, yet you said Minister Solomon would be coming on May 4.
I may be misunderstanding, but I'm not clear on how the study would impact a ministerial appearance if it was three meetings long, took precedence over other matters and began next Thursday. That's Thursday, April 23; Monday, April 27; and Thursday, April 30. Then it would be done, and the minister would be here the next Monday.