Thank you very much, Mr. Epp.
Colleagues, just before returning to Monsieur Ste-Marie to discuss and vote, if necessary, on the move from two to three meetings and the subamendment that Mr. Bardeesy wants to make, I just want to give everybody a sense of what the schedule looks like so we understand what we might be displacing before we enter the conversation about the number of meetings and the provision in the motion that specifies that this would supersede all business following April 23.
On this coming Monday, April 20, we have our second-last AI study meeting. That's not affected, because the motion specifies post-April 23. April 23 is our last meeting on EVs. That would not be impacted by this. The currently scheduled meeting that would be impacted by this is the one we have set on April 27, which is the fifth and final meeting of our AI study.
I just want everyone to be informed about what that looks like. We don't have any further committed business once we conclude the AI study. We do have some motions of proposed studies—including one from you, Madame Dancho, on fraud—but nothing that we've established on the calendar. The only other piece we have that we need to be mindful of is that Minister Solomon and his officials, at our request, have confirmed May 4 as an opportunity for him to appear.
Having said that, we may want to consider the necessity of adding an extra meeting or two in the week or so that follows the meeting on April 23 to accommodate this. That would be subject to House resources. We could displace the AI study on April 27, which would allow us to have April 27 as the first meeting on the mould-makers. April 30 would be the second meeting, but the third meeting would be Minister Solomon.
I just want everyone to be aware that if we stick to the terms of the motion as it currently exists, we are not accommodating Minister Solomon. I don't know what his availability will be.
I think we can work around this, but in the spirit of transparency and to make sure that we're all on the same page about what that superseding provision means, that's the lay of the land.
Madame Dancho, I think you want to speak to this, so I'll give the floor to you. Again, if there's further commentary before we get into actual amendments, I'd like to just hear that. If there's no further commentary, I'll go to Monsieur Ste-Marie.
Go ahead.