Thank you, Chair.
Thank you to the witnesses.
I'd like to go to Ms. Piovesan first.
My concern is that we're waiting for this AI framework and thinking one framework or one law will do it all, but we're hearing about ChatGPT. Then we're going to get to agentic AI. Then we're going to get to superintelligence. Some witnesses said that we should have an AI conversation in every single standing committee, which I tend to agree with.
Is it one law? Is it several laws? Is there any way this framework will be comprehensive enough? My concern is that, regardless of what we table, people will say that it's too much or not enough. Then we won't move forward.
What are your thoughts on the best approach at this time?