I think the stance of most creators and creator groups is that the Copyright Act already states that it's a human ability: that you have to have skill and judgment for copyright to exist and that skill and judgment are human actions. It's not a machine.
There is definitely the idea that generative AI is not falling within copyright. However, we still, as we spoke about earlier, have the issue that human-created works are in that output. That output is not the brainchild of a machine. It is derivative of other human creation, so we would like to see the compensation flow throughout input to output.