The last question your colleague asked also dives into what I would say about this. One thing that countries are doing is that they're picking the capabilities they want to be able to develop. When it comes to government playing a role as a customer or as investment, it can also be that they're maybe the only game in town, or a very big percentage, as we saw with SpaceX at the beginning.
As my colleague mentioned, if you are going to put restrictions on who can invest in their companies because you want to keep IP, that makes a lot of sense, but then you need to recognize that they need some support domestically to be able to do that and to ensure they have the capital they need to grow. You can't say, “Don't go get investors from another country,” but also “We have no money here for you in this domestically to be able to do so.”
Then, for launch specifically, I think.... This is not to speak on behalf of the government, but it seems like that is one that they indeed picked. They said, “This is something that we are going to build: sovereign capability.” I think the importance of it is that if ever we have some type of disruption, like a war, a conflict—and this literally has already happened to our sector—or we see trade conflicts, which has already happened to our country, we will not have to worry about our ability to get things up into space when we need to.
Given, to your point, that it is critical infrastructure, we need that capability domestically, and the government has to play a big role in funding it and making it happen, which it is.