Thank you very much.
I'm going to answer in English to make sure I use the correct technical terminology.
To distinguish between superintelligence and generative AI, it's important to understand that there's not a sharp boundary above which we have the risk, where the Nobel Prize winners and CEOs have warned of extinction, and then below which everything is fine. It's more of a continuum.
One of the biggest differences in kind is if the AI is able to autonomously perform tasks on its own for long periods of time, sometimes called an AI agent. The difference between AI agents and generative AI, like chatbots, is often that the AI is smarter being an agent. Then, because it's given more leeway, it has more dangers associated with it. The difference between AI agents and superintelligence is just a difference of degree, and that's why we don't call for unilateral disarmament. It's more a question of having an international trust-but-verify regime where whatever the level of risk is that we deem acceptable, we can go to that front and operate those systems, but there's a way to not go to the point where we actually lose control.
Can you very quickly begin your second question so I can answer?
