In that case, from what MP Bardeesy was talking about, it seems that you were able to take down a Globe and Mail article very quickly. Meta does have an enforcement mechanism to take something down quickly, like an article that was harmless and in fact would have actually added to the quality of life of people and society.
I want to quote the Reuters article that was mentioned by Mr. Shipley and others here. The unreported document showed that Meta “failed to identify and stop an avalanche of ads that exposed Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp’s billions of users to fraudulent e-commerce and investment schemes, illegal online casinos, and the sale of banned medical products.”
You're able to track down a Globe and Mail article that fast, yet you have an avalanche of ads that exposed billions of users. Do you not have mechanisms for that?