I understand it's a specific scenario. We're talking about a deepfake involving the Prime Minister of Canada, encouraging Canadians to invest fraudulently, using a platform that you own and operate, that led to the defrauding of $30,000 of an individual. It's a pretty specific, high-profile case.
If I understand correctly, Ms. Patell, what you're saying is that Google and YouTube do not, in the way that your policy is currently designed, believe that it is your responsibility to reach out to the person who is being impersonated, and that is therefore leading to the potential victimization of a Canadian. What you're saying is that the onus is on the public official to first enrol in a program that you offer, and then at that point they would be able to engage with you.
Do I understand that correctly?