I will take a few moments to make a 60-second digression.
I simply want to point out that the party I represent, the Bloc Québécois, is here to uphold democracy. Today, democracy was dealt a blow because on a committee each member has the right to receive the witnesses he or she wants to hear from.
As well, how is it possible to adopt a bill after such a quick study, without calling any witnesses to explain their point of view?
In any case, it was already clear from the start that Quebec does not agree with the process outlined in Bill C-26. However, you want engage us in this debate only to tell us that, although we have been democratically elected, democracy ends when the chair says so. I don't agree with that.
That's all I wanted to say.