I think we have a slightly different perspective, only for the fact that I think you can forebear for retail rate regulation and falling of tariffs in advance, but you need to establish a proper regime afterwards to monitor it. That's what I see missing from the CRTC, and there's no direction to change that. There should be some ongoing requirement and obligation under the Telecommunications Act to monitor what's happening and make sure that what is happening is in conjunction with the objectives of the Telecommunications Act, even things like having people send in rates for information, file rates, not to intervene beforehand but so that the CRTC has it on file, so the CRTC has files with the quality of services for retail service as well as wholesale, so they can see if there's a difference and if there's discrimination.
From our perspective, it's really about what the monitoring regime is going to be. I'm less concerned about whether it's 20% or 25%, or whether it's two players or three players. Let's have a regime afterwards. You can't just wash your hands of regulations and say, okay.... We don't know what the right number is, whether it's 25% or 30%, so we have to monitor it afterwards and put this in place. That's the big thing I see missing in both the CRTC's...and not varied by the direction as it stands today.