Obviously we have a different view of the competitiveness of the wireless market. Living it on a day-to-day basis, I can say that it certainly feels vigorously competitive when you're out there trying to win customers.
We believe the industry is indeed competitive. There are many brands out there. It's not just the three players who have their own infrastructure. There are other brands to choose from—Virgin, Fido, and so on. I think it's misleading to look at the market from just a customer perspective in terms of the three players who have their own infrastructure.
Secondly, there have been significant decreases in prices over the years. We actually prepared a study that examined the state of competition in the wireless industry. We'd be pleased to provide a copy of that to you. The study has quite a different view of the facts than the ones you suggest.
One difference between Canada and the U.S. that you have to take into account is where we are in the state of evolution of wireless competition. Wireless competition started in Canada a number of years later than in the U.S. If you actually compare us in terms of the number of years there's been wireless in the market, we're kind of on par with the U.S.
I could go on and on here, giving you a whole bunch of examples to show you the facts with regard to the state of competition in wireless. I don't think there's any risk of a lessening of competition in the wireless market, and I don't think, in the wireline local telephony market, there's any risk of re-monopolization. We have two wires into every home—the cable wire and the telephone wire—both of which are now broadband wires that can offer a full suite of telephone service, Internet service, and television service to the benefit of consumers.