Mr. Alton, we all had the embarrassing spectacle--all of us, I think, would agree at this table--of one country having to be dragged into court because it decided it wasn't going to necessarily follow the rules in order to assist its people.
But I'm asking the question: is it necessary, in your view? Why would you want to defend having the country name itself if there are existing safeguards to protect abuses, or do you actually believe that without naming the country there will be abuses?