Thank you.
It certainly is a valid point that spam is a global problem and that legislation therefore has to take account of international arrangements, as well as put forward the right legal powers to tackle spam domestically. The example of Australia is a good one. They've tried to make sure their domestic rules, through an Australian link, apply with respect to international origins of spam.
With respect to the point about Internet transmissions and how those are global because of the nature of the Internet--they can't be sourced in any one country, but they go through the whole network and then arrive at their destination, which could be anywhere--that's true. But the bill does provide for a specific exemption for telecommunication service providers when they're performing the function of telecommunications. Therefore, it's a waiver, if I can use that term, for the function of carriage, and certainly the example you use about the Internet would be captured by that.
Hopefully, we won't get caught by a specific transmission function that is going to be subject to any of these anti-spam provisions, certainly not as it relates to telecommunication service providers.