What I'm saying is that I don't anticipate the flood of lawsuits in Canada, in part because our court system is somewhat different from that of the United States. The fact that Utah was a leader in this regard isn't by accident. There was a very well-known spammer who was Utah-based, which is why the state felt that it was incumbent upon them to try to take action. You had other states that were of the same view, and then Congress jumped in to say okay, we're going to try to pre-empt all of those state laws, because now we're getting this patchwork, and that's making it difficult for business.
If there was a concern around spam laws at that time in the U.S., it was more that businesses were being faced with different regulatory systems in different states, not with the notion of complying with some sort of basic anti-spam legislation.