As I think we've mentioned, the experience elsewhere is that unless you have strong penalties, this doesn't work. I think there were even some quotes in the press from one Canadian-based spammer, who was laughing when told about the prospect of Canadian anti-spam legislation and indicated they figured they could just keep on going.
There's obviously a certain kind of profitability that a spammer or a fraudster is going to have. The only way to counter that is to make the risk far greater than it is today, that there are real financial penalties at stake. This legislation has that.
We keep bringing up Australia, but Australia is the one place where they brought in penalties that at the time were seen as unprecedented. The reports coming out of that country were that many of the spammers were either picking up and going elsewhere or finding a new line of work. It really did have the effect of increasing the risk of engaging in that business to the point that they went and did something else or did it somewhere else.