Thank you.
It's true, we all get irritating e-mails. Some of them we even get from people we like, with whom we have a personal and family relationship. So there's nothing we're going to do here to avoid getting e-mails that we don't all want to get. The issue is how you properly distinguish between the good ones and the bad ones, and that's where the debate is. I don't have any disagreement with you that all of those e-mails that clog up our e-mail inboxes from people we don't know and have never dealt with are ones that should be covered, and they'd be covered both by PIPEDA and by the ECPA. And they'd be covered even with the kinds of suggestions we were making to recalibrate the bill. Those e-mails that are clogging up our inboxes from people we don't know, they would not fall within the definition of implied consent or from a relationship we had. So I think we could deal with your clogged mailboxes--and they're all clogged mailboxes--even with a more flexible implied consent regime.