Yes, I think a five-year review will be useful. These are things that change significantly. I would say, however, that you have to put flexibility in the bill right now, because there can be a lot of harm caused on one side or the other during those five years that you don't want to happen. So you need to set it up correctly going in, and yes, you can review it after five years, but you have to have the flexibility in the bill itself. For example, you say we have been debating this since 2005. I was on that task force. As I say, we spent a lot of time just on the basic principles of spam, opt-in versus opt-out. We spent no time covering these kinds of provisions because we had never seen them, of course. We thought something should be done about spyware, but even the task force didn't go down to say, how exactly do we approach that?
What we want now is not to have the case of the person I've known for 20 years go and set up their own firm and all of a sudden he's susceptible to $10 million in civil lawsuits for sending out notices that I want to receive--as to where they're operating from now--or for things that can be downloaded onto my computer, or for perhaps the kind of unsubscribed mechanism that you can do on the computer that is not going to work well on the BlackBerry.