The act basically says it's an opt-in scheme. I may not send you an e-mail unless I have your consent, implicit or implied. That is a key provision, and it falls squarely into the realm of the competence of the CRTC. We enforce it. We decide whether or not there was consent. If there was no consent, we take remedial action.
The act also addresses two subsidiary offences. Not only could spam bother you with e-mails that you don't want, it could also send you misleading information that you act on to your detriment. To the extent that happens, the competition commissioner is specifically empowered to deal with the misleading advertising aspect of spam. As I say, I think they really could do it right now, because they have a ban on misleading advertising at any time, in any form. The act specifically means they can also do it for spam.
So is spam purely the jurisdiction of the CRTC? No, it's not. If you use spam for misleading advertising purposes, you also have to account for it to the competition commissioner.
It's the same thing if you use spam and address lists to somehow do something that violates the privacy provision of either the Privacy Act or PIPEDA. The Privacy Commissioner can come after you then.
So that's the scheme.