We have very good cooperation. We exchange views and information. But everybody is bound by the provisions of the statute and by the extent to which the statute allows you to exchange information or not.
I'm particularly concerned with the United States. For obvious reasons, it's the most important partner for us. My experience is that if you have legislation that basically mirrors the U.S. legislation, it works very well. They know it and understand it and so on. So if you ask that this be subject to international agreement, as set out here, you're going to wait an awfully long time. You're going to get the State Department and the justice and other agencies involved. It would be the same on our side as well. There would always be political overrides for particular situations.
Doing an international agreement is not so simple and straightforward, and here you want to have something quick. If there is spam that comes out of Utah, I want to be able to tell the FTC, “Listen, there's someone in Utah who systematically spams Canada. Get me the information so I can prosecute them.”
It's the same thing for them. If somebody in Manitoba spams into the States, I'll investigate. If I have the information, I want to have the ability to give it to them.
That's what the amendment that we put forward allows us to do.