Again, I'll go back to my statement about maximizing value. Every time we get to an asset transaction, it creates an equation around intellectual property--patents that get assigned to businesses, patents that get licensed. The rationale was quite simple: the buyer--remember where we were--the original buyer, the stalking horse buyer, NSN, that framed this transaction did not value those patents because it already had a rich collection of LTE development technology as well. Therefore, in our opinion, it wasn't going to give sufficient consideration to selling those patents with part of those assets.
On August 7th, 2009. See this statement in context.