To give just a quick response, we concur entirely with that notion. It raises a very valid point. It also goes to what Mr. Copeland was saying about the percentage of spam that is actually coming in from abroad as a percentage of total spam.
Clearly, everyone acknowledges the significant problems caused by the volumes of spam we see generally. But to the extent that this bill is clearly going to be applying principally in Canada and affecting Canadian spammers, and in looking at that and to what extent it is actually going to stop or stem the flow of the volumes of spam that we're seeing, vis-à-vis the kinds of costs that it can impose on Canadian companies in terms of significantly limiting their capacity to engage in essentially online commerce, this is something the committee should consider very seriously when they're doing the bill.