Yes, the opening is there. If you look at clause 10(3)(c), it reads as follows:
(c) the person to whom the message is sent has disclosed, to the person who sends the message, the person who causes it to be sent or the person who permits it to be sent, the electronic address to which the message is sent indicating a wish not to receive unsolicited commercial electronic messages at the electronic address [...]
So we have made amendments to take those exact circumstances into account. A lawyer goes to a reception and gives his card to a real estate agent. That's allowed. It's clear now that that way of communicating is legitimate.