Could I make a supplemental observation on that?
The regulatory powers we have asked for have all been within the context of the ability to expand and ease what otherwise might create difficulties for legitimate activities. The opposing theory is that every time a new evil arises, you make new regulations and cover it that way. But speaking as counsel to a government department who has been functioning for 30 years in the public service, I can assure you that an enforcement regime where you're chasing the evil rather than covering things and letting the good guys out is by far the easier and cheaper enforcement approach. I think it is easiest for industry as well, once they get used to the rules of the game.