Sorry, you're correct. I meant to say that it would be added after “the defence of Canada”. It's adding something substantially different to the interpretation clause. What it's doing is referencing a possible provincial legislature, a possible provincial body established by a province. And that was never part of the interpretation clause before. In other words, what you're proposing in your amendment is to recognize a body that might be established by a legislature in a province. That is substantially different from what is in the interpretation clause. That's why I've ruled your amendment out of order.
Now, if you wish to challenge the chair, you can do so. I'll seek to see if the majority of the members of this committee will sustain me in my ruling. If my ruling is sustained, then the ruling will stand. If you feel that you want to challenge it further, you could go to the Speaker of the House.