Let me give you an example. If you had an insider who had made a $50,000 excess profit as a result of insider trading and you trebled damages, that's $150,000. If in that same timeframe there have been purchasers who traded a million dollars worth of securities opposite that—if it is a sale, they purchased a million dollars worth of securities in that time window—then each of them would be entitled to 15% of that loss. So it would be $150,000 that would go over to people with claims who traded a million dollars worth of stock in that period of time. So the proper amount of damages has been tripled and paid over to the plaintiffs in this hypothetical class action.
Now, as to whether that will make a significant difference, I think we'd have to look at the U.S. experience with this and perhaps the Australian experience with these types of models. It certainly is a model that's out there, but it just has never been pursued. The reason is that right now Canadian law requires a matching, both at the provincial and at the federal level. In other words, there has to be a matching of that, and that's very difficult to establish.