My next question is specifically for ACOA, although it would apply to everybody. I've just been reading a CBC news article from today that says “Charlottetown grabs big chunk of stimulus cash”. It's comparing the spending in four ridings of P.E.I.
I guess the question that comes out of this, which probably relates to ridings across the country, is in relation to boundaries, be they political boundaries or whatever. Maybe you can comment on the statement that needs and benefits don't always follow political boundaries. Is that a fair assessment?
For example, I'm thinking about my going out and doing an announcement in Edmonton on a project on the Anthony Henday Drive. It's outside my riding, but is of tremendous benefit to the people in my riding who drive on that road every day.
I'll ask the ACOA folks to speak to the specific example of P.E.I. in terms of that statement that needs and benefits don't always follow political boundaries.