I can take a shot at that. For example, in the case of RInC, the program is organized so that a project must be funded one third, one third, and one third. This means that for every third the federal government puts in, two-thirds gets added to the project.
On CAF, it depends. We administer CAF in ACOA according to the terms and conditions of our program. All the programs require participation and that participation can be anywhere from 50% to... I'd say it's probably averaging 50%.
So there's a lot of leverage involved in the projects. Even in the case of one third, one third, and one third, some people put in more. Some communities put in more money.