Yes. It has been an issue for not-for-profits because most of them have volunteer members. But right now those volunteer directors for not-for-profits basically have unlimited liability because they're not under the more modern regime where there are some defences to a liability action.
The new act will make a clear statement of directors' duties, and basically it says that directors must always act in the best interest of the corporation. That doesn't give them blanket immunity, but what it does is provide a due diligence defence, which of course modern statutes allow. But the old act, the one we're hoping to change, doesn't allow that yet. But the defence will say that as long as a director has acted with due diligence, they can escape liability. So they have that protection of if they acted reasonably with due diligence, they then would be protected from a liability action.
Right now they don't have that protection for not-for-profits to that extent, and some directors for not-for-profits are pretty worried about that. And that's one of the reasons why there has been so much pressure to finally get this act passed and the new regime put into place.
Does anybody want to add anything about that?