In the Ontario act? Well, I think it was kind of the same reasons that we made the same recommendation here. We really believe the complexity of the non-profit sector is too large for one act, which perhaps only gets changed every 50 or 100 years, to really take into consideration.
The reality is that the non-profit sector encompasses universities, hospitals, food banks, animal shelters, international aid organizations, political parties, actually, in some respects of how the sector is defined, and professional organizations. There are all kinds of examples of organizations for various professions. They're all part of the non-profit sector, and they can all incorporate as organizations without shared capital.
We feel that any time an act tries to classify, as in this case, the soliciting and non-soliciting organizations--in the proposed Ontario act they had a variety of ways--it's easier and more efficient not to do that. The added benefit is so small that it's not worth the added complexity.
Susan, do you have something to add?