Maybe I'll take this one first. It will give you guys a chance to think about that.
I respect where you're coming from. I apologize for not being able to answer the question in French, but my French is not strong enough to answer this complex question.
I think there is a slippery slope you are identifying in the linkage between the broadcasters--the players who play there--and the players who are on the telecom side of the house. In our case, we have nothing to do with the broadcast side. You bring up something that is a complicating factor, because a lot of the incumbents play on both sides. If you deregulate one side of the house, how do you ensure that the slippery slope doesn't affect the other side of the house?
We believe that we are a Canadian company, and not by some legal test. My largest shareholder is Canadian. “Follow the money” was an old expression I heard from a forensic accountant once. Follow the money and you'll decide who actually makes the decisions. In our case, we are a Canadian company, full stop. Do I have some foreign money? Yes, I do. I have some American partners. But my largest shareholder is OMERS. The largest private individual investor is me. I am a Canadian. I was born here. So I look at that....