As policy-makers and parliamentarians, we have to look at the long term, and I am concerned about some of the things I'm hearing. In the short term it sounds as though we're going to get great competition, meaning we're going to get great prices. One of the terms that was brought up as well was, as I think Mr. Krstajic mentioned, sustainable players, yet in every study we've looked at, and as you even mentioned yourselves this morning, in time it all boils down to about two or three players again.
How does that benefit Canadians? You have very adventuresome investors come in, and once the consolidation takes place again down the road, it was mentioned that we might end up in another monopoly situation. That is great for investors, but how does that benefit Canadians in the long run? Down the road they again end up with a monopoly, or two or three players; the investment that came up is not Canadian, but from another country; and when you owe money, the people you owe money to basically control how you run your company, no matter how you look at it.
Maybe you can comment on that.