Okay.
Let me shift to the bureau now, because I only have a few minutes before another person takes a question here.
Is the bureau of the view that even if this is not a merger, the supply potential, the disruption to the economy, and the potential for an economic hit, which could have an impact just in terms of price availability, would not concern the bureau as it did with the Texaco resolution in 1989? When you had a lot more refineries at the time--taking into consideration some of the comments that have been made here--you nevertheless ordered a divestiture order, at least a hold order, to make sure that the refinery in Montreal remained open, notwithstanding the fact that this may not have been, quote, a “merger”; it was more of a forced merger.
Why are you not looking at this with the same concerns with supply arrangements, which will have an impact ultimately on competition throughout the eastern part of this country?