I'm correcting the record.
Clearly what happened was that the budget, instead of having one fund for CAP, had two funds for CAP. One fund was closed down except for $2 million for those CAP sites that were outside a 25-kilometre radius of a competing access point, but the other fund is in fact funding the remaining sites on CAP.
Obviously, one set of letters went out not referring to the fact that there was going to be another fund that was going to pick up the slack. We've corrected that mistake. The funding was always there. It was never cut. It was always part of the budget. It was never not part of the budget. We've corrected the record as quickly as we possibly could.
Letters have already gone out. They were received electronically at the CAP sites yesterday. They're all aware that their funding is in place.