That is not what I understood to be the correct interpretation. Departmental officials said that, based on the current wording of Bill C-393, if we do not add that drugs listed in Schedule 1 must be recommended by the Minister or another entity, in fact, we don't really know how drugs could be added or what process would have to be followed to add them to the schedule.
Now Mr. Masse is saying that he is going to remove a certain number of clauses from Bill C-393, so that there will not longer be an issue as to who would be authorized to add products to Schedule 1, and so as to ensure that this will in fact be done based on the recommendation from the Minister of Health.
I simply want to be sure that if we revert to the definitions as they currently appear in section 21.02 of the Act—and if Bill C-393 is subsequently passed—there will be some mechanism whereby we could actually identify the individual or entity authorized to add products to Schedule 1.