All right, thank you.
Ms. Morgan, what I like best in your entire presentation is the last sentence. It is the one where you say that the government will take time to consult and to fully consider options before moving forward. The issue is very important.
The difference between telecommunications and broadcasting, which you talked about earlier, is no longer obvious.Telecommunications is the wiring and broadcasting is what goes on inside. Whoever controls the wiring controls what is inside; whoever controls access controls content. That is increasingly clear with wireless telephones, and so on. I am not going to paint you a picture since that would insult your intelligence. We know that ring tones, for example, are created by musicians. It is they who decide the language to be used and we can even watch a video on our phones. Even the Wilson panel, whose study you cited, says on the first page that it is becoming increasingly difficult to differentiate between telecommunications and broadcasting. A number of people will probably come and say that is impossible. There are those who think it and those who say it.
You are also making a comparison with the European Union, but, unfortunately, the situations are not the same. Canada—and Quebec, which is six times larger than France—is a vast country with other problems, sitting next to an extremely formidable and entertaining cultural empire. We are in a situation where we have to protect our culture. We have to protect it in our telecommunications devices, for example, and in every possible way.
Before asking you my question, let me digress, since it is quite obvious that you have put the cart before the horse. You have decided to enforce the law you want even before passing it. It flies in the face of all evidence that Globalive was in fact controlled by Orascom.
What kind of measures are you currently thinking of incorporating in your future bill to curb foreign ownership in telecommunications, and to protect Quebec and Canadian culture?