That motion was not to end Bill C-501. The motion of instruction is what you're talking about, right? The motion of instruction was originally put forward to increase the scope of the bill. In other words, what's happened with the bill now is that if amendments were to be introduced now that go beyond the scope of the bill or are judged to be beyond the scope of the bill, the chair would likely rule them out of order, and they wouldn't have an opportunity. The motion of instruction was there in case I wanted to use it to move forward, to possibly bring it forward.
I'll tell you what the intention would be, had I used that motion of instruction. It would have been to open up, I think it's section 136, and move it from “secured” to “preferred”. That would have been the idea of that motion of instruction.
I guess the motion of instruction is still sitting on the table, but that's not my intention here today.