TekSavvy and some of its colleagues appeared before the commission about two weeks ago and made representations on our latest ruling. They said basically they liked the ruling, but they thought we went too far, and rather than averaging, we would make them impose it on individual users. That's something they had not told us before. It was never explained in that way, and I expect when we now have the hearing, TekSavvy and other companies will come before us and explain how we could do this.
I certainly did not get the impression from them that the whole idea of usage-based billing is anathema to them. But they feel we did not implement it in the best way for them to give the maximum flexibility, etc. They are constrained to say that we forced them to become like a big telco, that they are small companies and they wanted to be flexible. If this can be done, I'm all for it.