All right. Retail equivalence—and this is an important point—is, practically speaking, unenforceable, because no one really knows what the retail pricing plans of Bell are. There's no regulation of retail pricing. There's no requirement to publish. At any given point in time, Bell may have hundreds of retail pricing plans out there. So it's fundamentally unfair, because the commission doesn't have the power to police or to monitor Bell's retail pricing.
Third, I would say that retail equivalence allows the commission to do indirectly what it said it wouldn't do, which is to regulate retail pricing. Because it's regulating the retail pricing of competitor fees.